The couple submitted an inquiry to keep their texts confidential with “top -class” people, and quoted concerns that Baldonis camps may hand them over to the press.
However, Justin Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman has backed back at Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds and described their proposal “unnecessary”.
The article is continued under the advertising
Blake Lively & Ryan Reynolds are fighting to keep converstions with “top -class” people privately
Lively and Reynolds want their conversations to be held privately while their ongoing court dispute continues against Baldoni wages.
At a hearing before the Federal Court of Manhattan on Thursday, lawyer Meryl Conant said that the couple had given a protective arrangement before talks with “top -class” people about Lively’s time in “It ends with us” because they fear that Baldoni could shine the press per press Rab.
The lawyer said in court that such texts had a high “PR value” regardless of whether they are relevant for the fact of the case or not.
“There is a significant likelihood of irreparable damage if marginal conversations with top -class people should get into the wrong hands without relevance,” said Government Ki.
The article is continued under the advertising
“There are 100 million reasons for these parties to violate information because the PR value is greater than the instructions of the court,” added the lawyer.
The article is continued under the advertising
Blake Lively’s lawyer discussed potential leaks of information on “profound psychological health problems” in connection with “profound mental health problems”.
According to the news agency, LIVELY’s lawyer continued to urge the judge Lewis Liman to place an additional security level that is known as just “lawyers’ category for such texts as well as information about the mental health of the parties and the security measures of the parties and security measures in the feud.
Governski emphasized that such a name should be placed on information, including “over children, profound psychological health problems or locations of private houses or houses”.
When Liman asked against government Ki whether she implied that Baldonis’ lawyers were a “risk” for lively and Reynold’s security, said the lawyer “No”.
However, Governski found that the co-accused of Baldoni “enclosed” people, whose livelihood is based on the provision of information for press and content creators.
The article is continued under the advertising
Justin Baldoni is based on the actress’s new request
Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman has been back on the request of the Power couple and said that it was “unnecessary” and “insulting that everyone would suggest that we would disregard a protection order”.
Freedman added that the Livively and Reynolds’ Plan “Celebrity” and “People who are powerful in the industry” would treat differently than others.
He also explained that a so -called “model” return order, which was presented to the court in order to protect sensitive information sufficiently in this case.
“My customers have the right to defend themselves, they have a transparency right” New York PostAnd added that his proposed setup did not “abuse” alive.
The article is continued under the advertising
The judge holds his decision, but warns of potential leaks
Judge Liman did not pass his decision immediately and said he would give his view “soon”. However, he warned that the case, since the case has aroused public interest, “a presumption of public access” in federal devices.
Liman added that the existing provisions of the proposed protective arrangement would already prevent third parties from reaching confidential information to the press, and added that such leaks could be despised in court, causing a fine or even a prison sentence.
This happened after Liman proposed on Tuesday that he can reject that New York Times As a defendant in Baldoni’s lawsuit against Lively.
The star “Jane the Virgin” denied allegations of sexual harassment that the actress “Gossip Girl” submitted him to $ 250 million against her and the news agency, which published her accusations.
He then pursued a $ 400 million counteruit against Lively, Reynolds and her publicist Leslie Sloane and accused her of destroying his reputation and the wrest control over the film.
Judge Liman said that New York Times’ 28. February 28. Application, which is to be excused from the case, offered “essential reasons for dismissal” and “a strong presentation that his application for dismissal will probably meet the merits”.
The article is continued under the advertising
Blake Lively’s request for Justin Baldonis call protocols and texts were rejected
The latest court hearing takes place after the subjugation of LIVELY has applied for more than two years of the call and text data of the director of Richter Liman.
Lively had asked for “documents about ingoing and outgoing calls or text messages … within the period of December 1, 2022 to the present day.
However, Liman decided to Gunz von Baldoni and said that Lively’s request could lead to sensitive information in connection with doctors and psychologists and communication with people who do not transform with their case.
The judge also questioned the reason of Lively to apply for call and text data from two years before Baldoni’s suspected compression campaign.
“Lively mainly argues that the lectures will help identify the larger network of individuals that maintained a negative media campaign against them” Daily Mail.
He continued: “But according to Lively’s complaint, this negative campaign only began at around August 2024 … So it is unclear how communication and Wayfarer parties in 2022 and 2023 people who took part in the campaign would reveal.”
