When it comes to Justin Baldoni against Blake Lively, it is clear who wins

Baldoni was not only her costary, but he was also the director of the film, who brought him into a position of power over the Alaun “Gossip Girl”. Lively has accused him of having used this force to sexually harass it on the set and shake them into body. Baldoni, on the other hand, accused her of trying to put away creative control over the film from him.

So who is right? Who is going wrong? In the case of complaints that fly on both sides, you remain aware of who will win in front of the Court of Justice, but before the court of public opinion, it seems that LIVELY’s ship is slowly falling.

The #metoo movement may not be in the spotlight as before, but that did not prevent women from being sexually harassed at film sets. But did that really happen here? In view of the information that has come to light, Lively on the set was uncomfortable and possibly justified in this way. Without being there to watch things first -hand, it is difficult for someone to come to a conclusion that really happened behind closed doors.

Many people would say that if she felt so uncomfortable with Baldoni, she should have vocalized her concern with him long before filming. And I agree with that. Is it fair to submit a lawsuit after the film is already finished? If she was harassed as she claims, then yes, maybe if she was afraid of a kind of retaliation, but the evidence that has been created so far does not seem like a woman who was afraid to use her voice.

Baldoni’s team has leaked a treasure of information and even Started his own website With the title “Lamentation”, which shares alleged text messages, which includes itself, lively and her husband. Ryan Reynolds. This situation has come out of control so that even Lively’s close friend pop star Taylor Swiftwas drawn into the lawsuit. Ultimately, it looks like being alive the one who brought them there.

If you film a romantic drama that deals with domestic violence, you need an intimate coordinator on the set. “IT ends with us” had an intimacy coordinator, but according to Baldonis changed complaint, which was listed on his website, Lively decided to skip the first meeting in which they outlined the sex scenes in the film and how they would play on the screen.

After she “rejected” the meeting, Baldoni claims that he was in the “less ideal position to forward these notes in her penthouse”, and used terms such as “Down on her”, “orgasm” and “foreplay.”

His lawyers claim that “these notes would later become the basis for the complaint of LIVELY, in which she realized that Baldoni would talk about his own sex life and insert unfounded scenes with Lively’s character orgashing”.

After reading her lawsuit, it seems as if this conversation was part of her annoyance claim, but it is worth noting that Lively made some strange comments on working with an intimacy coordinator before. In an interview with August 2024 with Access to HollywoodLively dealt with some strange comments that she is her own intimacy coordinator on the set. “Incidentally, that shouldn’t happen. I just want to be clear, ”she said when she was asked what it was like to“ be the intimacy coordinator in some of these sexual scenes ”.

“You shouldn’t be the intimacy coordinator. You should definitely set intimacy coordinators, ”she added. “Thank God.”

The interviewer described it Colleen Hoover Those who jumped into the conversation and said she saw it on Instagram herself. Lively seemed uncomfortable when she pulled the end of her hair and stammered a little when she continued the interview.

At the end of January, a romantic dance scene appeared online behind the scenes. The video that was preserved by TMZShows that they replace uncomfortable jokes as they fluctuate back and forth. This scene is important because it was described directly in lively evidence that Baldoni has bothered her.

According to the court report, Lively claimed, Baldoni leaned “forward and slowly dragged his lips out of her ear and neck when he said:” It smells so good ‘… When Ms. Lively later leaned against this behavior, Mr. Baldonis answer Was: “I’m not even dressed by you.”

In the video, Baldoni makes an uncomfortable joke that his nose is “so big” after lively attention drawn attention to it. Lively also tells him: “I will probably get spray browns on you”, whereupon Baldoni replies: “It smells good.”

It certainly puts the description of the LIVELY scene in the right perspective.

According to Baldoni’s lawsuit, Lively implied that she would “change” her opinion to ask Taylor Swift to use her song “My Tears Ricochet” in the film trailer, unless her demands have been met. The demands in this case processed the rights of the film. In the submission, Baldoni contained a suspected text exchange with a Sony manager that was:

“Blake calls Taylor to approve the song. Of course, she only said that she asks her editor about time. We know that it is a contract, but asked if you will rethink this (edit) . This trailer and Blake do not change your mind

Another alleged text message shows Baldoni and Lively, which deals with a script change that Lively wanted to make. The text messages deal with a meeting that took place in Lively’s Penthouse, with both Reynolds and Swift.

Baldoni told her that he “really” loved the changes she had made, and believed that they made the scene in question on the roof “funnier and interesting”, but noticed that “without Ryan and Taylor would have felt “.

LIVELY then compared himself to a “Game of Thrones” and supposedly answered:

“I happen to have a few dragons. For good or bad, but usually for the better. Because my dragons also protect those for whom I fight., I can promise you.”

It remains to be seen how Taylor Swift is called a “beautiful monster”. Conflict reports have arisen about their friendship, but it is worth mentioning that they have not been photographed together since October. Other reports have shown Swift should never be at the sessionBut it just went on when Swift visited her friend.

Lively’s attempt to promote the film was hit with Memes for weeks after treating the film like a traditional Rome com, and encouraged the fans to “grab your girls to wear your flowers” while they are in the theater went. Perhaps it is a little in the nose to write a story about a girl named Lily who runs a flower shop, but the online fans were of the opinion that it was inappropriate to reduce a film about domestic violence to something barbie-like .

According to Baldoni’s changed complaint on his website, LiveLy turned to his production team and asked her to blame for the negative press that she received in the advertising for the film, which also included a one An interview dipped again that she is rude to a reporter.

According to the court documents of Baldoni, lively and Reynold’s “claim (ED)” that their statement is published in Baldoni and the name of his company and that the refusal means that the “gloves go off”. It is quite clear that the Baldoni production team never published the statement and the gloves have indeed came out.

So when it comes to Justin Baldoni against Blake Lively, who will come out?

Kristin says when it comes to the court of public opinion, Baldoni has the upper hand. He has dropped his dirty laundry throughout the Internet so that everyone can see them (including one Watched 2 o’clock in the morning language memo) in the effort to defend themselves from Lively’s claims. He wants to make it clear that your allegations have no earnings and after what has been exposed so far, it looks lively like the attacker.

At the same time, Lively is married to Ryan Reynolds and it is doubtful that her career – or his, this matter – will be influenced by the lawsuit that is currently to begin in March 2026. Baldoni already achieved a legal victory against Monday when A judge rejected LIVELY’s request to a GAG connectionThis means that more evidence will probably appear in the coming weeks.

For Baldoni it may be difficult to take the career in the parts in relation to career, no matter how his legal dispute unfolds, but he can go away from all of this to prove that he did not molestly as she claimed as she claimed , and for him that he has that he was not harassing it, and for him that justification could be enough.