In an explanation, the DGAPR rejected claims of or in a recently raised claims on YouTube interview and described it as misleading and inaccurate. The allegations concerned the prisons of Ain Sebaa 1 and Tiflet 2, where or served.
The prison authority said or asked to be placed in a single cell during his first detention in Ain Sebaa, an inquiry that was granted. The cell met the hygiene standards and ensured that the DGAPR was underlined.
With regard to excessive surveillance claims, the delegation said that all occupants are subject to the same legal controls for telephone calls and correspondence.
Or also claimed that his cell in Tiflet 2 was affected by insects. The DGAPR rejected the claim and explained that the facility was regularly held with a assigned budget for cleanliness.
The explanation added that the inmate received access to leisure activities, including music classes, and regular medical care. He receives prescribed medication from both prison doctors and from his family, together with a special diet.
The DGAPR confirmed that during an arm wrestling match with another inmate in Tiflet 2, a crossbreak was maintained. He was taken to an external hospital for surgery, and the prison administration informed the public prosecutor, who introduced an investigation. His family was allowed to visit him during his hospital stay.
The former inmate also received several visits from the National Human Rights Council (CNDH) and its regional branch in Morocco. However, he never submitted an official complaint about his detention conditions, said the DGAPR.
