Justin BaldoniAttorney, Bryan FreedmaN, struck Blake lively After submitting to the actor’s 400 million dollars.
Freedman claims that the actress attempts to manipulate the legal system as a “privileged elite”, but swore to keep it “responsible for her actions of pure malice”.
Judge Lewis Liman has already given Blake Lively and her husband a modified protection order Ryan Reynolds‘Talks with “top -class” people after requesting it and expressing fears that Justin Baldoni could exchange them from the press.
The article is continued under the advertising
Justin Baldoni’s lawyer takes an excavation from Blake Lively
Baldoni’s lawyer recently struck Lively after submitting the 400 million dollar counterfeit against her, her husband Reynolds and her publicist Leslie Sloane from the Court.
“LIVELY’s latest application to contract by the catastrophe she initiated himself is one of the most hideous examples of the abuse of our legal system” is one of the most hideous examples ” Daily Mail. “Strict rules are introduced to protect the innocent and rightly enable the individual to rightly defend themselves.”
The article is continued under the advertising
He continued to notice that “laws should not be twisted and curated by privileged elites in order to adapt their own personal agenda”, since he swore to “continue to blame Ms. Lively for her actions of pure malice, including incorrectly accused my customers, harassment and retaliation”.
Freedman added that the “fantastic claims of the” Gossip Girl “stars are quickly exposed when Discovery progresses and easily refutes from actual, proving evidence.”
The article is continued under the advertising
Blake Lively files to reject a lawsuit of 400 million US dollars
According to the news agency, the LIVELY lawyers have submitted all cases against the actress to mark the 400 -million dollar lawsuit by Baldoni as “vengeful and wandering” and to say that the “application of the director” “a” profound abuse of the legal process that has no place before a federal court “.
Court documents also showed that their continuous legal measures against LIVELY costs the Baldoni team due to a legal provision in Section 47.1 in California, the people who talked about sexual harassment or submitted legal claims.
The article is continued under the advertising
“The law prohibits the weapons of defamation lawsuits like this to take revenge against people who have submitted legal claims or have publicly spoken about sexual harassment and retaliation,” the documents said.
“The right to search for legal remedies and the right of the press, to report on them, are holy principles that are protected by several privileges, including legal disputes and the fair reports that are absolutely,” continued it.
The article is continued under the advertising
“In addition, the Wayfarer parties, by submitting their claims under California law, voluntarily have their entire lawsuit in the recently issued Californian Civil Code section 47.1 (‘Section 47.1’), in which statements and the associated reasoning and the associated application and the associated application Connected documentation, the documentation and the associated allegations, documentation and documentation, and the stress processes, which have broken down.
The actress’s lawyers give the reason for her application to dismiss your co-star’s lawsuit
Lively’s lawyers, led by Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, have given reasons for their application to dismiss Baldoni’s defamation.
After saying that the lawsuit “a profound abuse of the legal procedure that has no place in front of a federal court”, they further stated that California laws “expressly prohibit the victims” who spoke against sexual harassment or retaliation.
They said: “These meritless and retaliatory measures first operate in three legal obstacles, including the legal disputes, the fair report and the sexual harassment, of which the latter contain an obligatory shift in fees, for which, like the Milliard Steve Sarowitz, Wayfarer-Studios and other, which have been made difficult to do the damage, and others Applications against Ms. Lively Damagen are raised. “
The article is continued under the advertising
The lawyers added: “In other words, in an epic self-company, the Wayfarer parties’ attempt to sue Ms. Lively ‘in Oblivion’ only created more liability for them, and so, in view of what they did.”
Ryan Reynolds also asked that Justin Baldoni’s lawsuit should be thrown
The application for LIVELY’s dismissal was submitted after her husband Ryan Reynolds submitted to Baldoni’s lawsuit against him and claimed that the actor could not sue him for “injured feelings”.
Baldoni’s lawsuit accused Reynolds of mocking and bullied by using the character of “Nicepool” in “Deadpool & Wolverine” to satirize Baldonis “Feminist”.
He also accused Reynolds of describing him as a “sexual predator” while at the same time claiming that he had insulted him that he was supposedly lively “grease -accurate”.
In an application to dismiss the claims, Reynold’s lawyer did not deny that the Nice Pool character was based on Baldoni, but he showed “thin-skinned outrage” by complaining about how he complained diversity.
The article is continued under the advertising
Ryan Reynold’s lawyers claim that he has the right to call Justin Baldoni as a “sexual predator”,
Reynold’s lawyers found in their court file that the labeling of Baldoni by the actor is protected as a “sexual predator” by the constitution.
The “allegations suggest that Mr. Reynolds really and perhaps passionately believes that Mr. Baldoni’s behavior of a” predator “” reflects “, the movement explained. “(T) The law finds that it means a constitutionally protected opinion of calling someone as’ predator ‘… While Mr. Baldoni’ may not appreciate that it is called” predator “, these injured feelings do not lead to legal claims.”
“Mr. Reynolds has the right to keep Mr. Baldoni – or a man from whom Reynolds believes his wife sexually harassed – in ‘deep disadain’ – the court was according to the court document.
