Justin Baldoni claims

Justin Baldoni Has submitted new legal documents in which the court was asked to throw Blake livelyThe request of the publicist to be rejected from their controversial legal dispute.

Baldoni claimed that Lively’s publicist ,, Leslie Sloanemade him a “scapegoat” and “played an active and integral role in a conspiracy to harm him”.

It comes when Blake Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds could look for protection for their conversations with other celebrities because of fears Justin Baldonis camp.

Baldoni argues that Lively’s publicist Sloane, Sloane, should not be removed from her controversial lawsuit because she made him a “scapegoat” for the “suffering of the actress”.

Through her lawyer, Sigrid McCawley, Sloane submitted legal documents for her and her company Vision PR to be released by LIVELY, her husband Ryan Reynolds and herself from Baldoni and his production company Wayfarer Studios.

According to the Daily MailThe actor “IT ends with us” reached legal documents to contest the request, and claimed that Sloane and her company “played an active and integral role in a conspiracy to harm him, his production company and his PR team by Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.

Baldoni said in the opposition’s memorandum that Sloane had “conspired” with lively, Reynolds and that New York Times “Create scapegoats from the Wayfarer parties for Lively’s suffering”.

He claims that everything is “in desperate efforts to save Lively’s reputation and escape her anger”.

Baldoni claimed that Sloane and her PR company had “worked for months of falling bread crumbs and references to dark allegations, while she secretly fits the falsehoods of a reporter who would listen to”.

Elsewhere in the submission, Baldoni dragged the New York Times Reporter who described the article about the alleged sexual harassment of LIVELY and compression campaign.

Since then, the actor has submitted a lawsuit of 250 million US dollars against the publication and argues that Lively gave them the information to affect his image.

“As a direct result of (her) actions, Baldoni claimed that he and those in his team” were damaged “about measured”, was the document. “Your reputation will be destroyed, your shops are in ruins and your own film was taken from them.”

In the meantime, a judge proposed on Tuesday that he could reject that New York Times As a defendant in the case.

The US district judge Lewis Liman in Manhattan said that the application of the publication of February 28, to be apologized from the case, had “essential reasons for the dismissal” and “a strong indication that the application for dismissal will probably be merit”.

In the middle of her legal dispute against Baldoni, the actress “Gossip Girl” and her husband are looking for a protective evidence to hold her conversations with celebrities privately.

At a hearing before the Federal Court of Manhattan on Thursday, lawyer Meryl Conant said that the couple had given a protective arrangement before talks with “top -class” people about Lively’s time “it ends with us” because they fear that Baldoni could exchange them for the press.

The lawyer said in court that such texts had a high “PR value” regardless of whether they are relevant for the fact of the case or not.

“There is a significant probability of irreparable damage if marginal conversations with top -class people should get into the wrong hands without relevance” without relevance ” New York Post.

“There are 100 million reasons for these parties to violate information because the PR value is greater than the instructions of the court,” added the lawyer.

Although no name was mentioned in your request to keep your conversations privately, the Hollywood couple has close relationships with A-List stars such as Taylor Swift, Hugh Jackman, Emily Blunt, John Krasinski and Model Gigi Hadid.

Swift was apparently moved into the case when Baldoni claimed that Lively called Khaleesi from “Game of Thrones” and described her husband and the “empty room” classer as “my dragon”.

According to reports, the global pop star would be charged to give certificates, but right -wing experts believe that their continued silent “speaks volumes”.

PR expert, Adrienne Uthe, spoke about the likelihood that Swift was legally pulled in Baldoni and Livelys.

“Taylor has publicly distanced himself – and I understand why. She hopes to stay out of chaos” Fox news. “But that’s not the reality. Whether he likes it or not, people want to hear their testimony. She is silent because nothing good comes out of use – and frankly, who would want it if they were in their position? But their silence also says a lot.”

“She seems to be in harmony with Hollywood’s Power Players – and that clouds the image of ‘Good Girl’, which many of her fans have recorded,” added u.

“For many reasons, people remain strategically calm, and sure, some stars only want to avoid the press. But for someone who versed as Taylor Swift to keep out of it? That speaks volumes. And frankly we want to hear all of their site,” added the PR expert.