Folding the right between those who believe in a global system that is supported by US military mercy, and others who see this system as an outflow of US resources are not new. This schism has been in existence for decades.
The latter group, which often included Ultra-Nativist and racist figures, was pushed into the edges after the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001.
The United States reacted to these attacks by starting a global “war against terror”, with conservative US interventions in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan strongly supported.
But these wars were seen as bloody and persistent failures when the public became more skeptical about the participation of the United States abroad.
“Especially young people who have witnessed these catastrophic wars are not sold about the advantages of these global US security architecture or the ideology that leads to interventions abroad,” said Mills.
Since the first took office in 2017, Trump has continued the routine use of the US military power overseas, monitored the drone attacks in the Middle East and in Africa and murdered the Iranian General Qassem Soleimani during his first term.
During his second term, he openly thought about using military violence to take control of the Panama Canal and the Greenland.
However, experts said that he also recorded the political advantages of the candidate and critic of a foreign policy establishment that was discredited in the eyes of many voters.
In his 2024 presidential campaign, for example, Trump promised that the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East bring a quick end of the wars, where Israel’s war in Gaza killed more than 49,617 Palestinians – a number that experts said is probably a subcontractor because the thousands of bodies that still bury.
Trump’s attitude towards Ukraine was happy to see many on the right, who consider his actions as proof of a transaction approach that puts our interests first.
For example, the President has put Ukraine under pressure to grant the United States access to its mineral resources as compensation for the costs of the US military aid. This week he even hovered the shift control over the energy infrastructure of Ukraine into the US hands.
But Trump hesitated more to put a similar pressure on Israel, even as the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned a ceasefire that was boasting by Trump himself.
“In general, I believe that the Trump administration has made certain decisions that reflect the willingness to end conventions in a way that some people find alarming, e.g.
“But I think Israel has its own heaviness, and the guidelines in connection with Israel are not influenced by some of them.
This inconsistency indicates larger tensions in Trump’s coalition.
While ambivalence and even the complete hostility to Ukraine have become common on the right, the foreign policy writer Matthew Petti, a deputy editor of the Libertar Reason Magazine, said the conservative movement was drawn in various directions when it comes to Israel, a long-standing USAally.
“The newly discovered dislike of foreign wars, especially in the Middle East, gathered uncomfortably with the right -wing cultural affinity for Israel,” he told Al Jazera by text.
“The question has recently become impossible to ignore it lately, since Israel has become the main fight for the US knitting in the region.”
He explained that although a larger generation debate about Israel and the US foreign policy, which played far right, is expressly shaped with internal departments.
For example, some see Israel as a valuable template for muscle nationalism. In contrast, there are figures such as Nick Fuentes, which include unshakable anti -Semitism, Trump’s hug of Israel.
It remains to be seen how these contradictions work in Trump’s movement.
While public support for Israel has weakened in recent years, especially among young voters, the Republican Party is still for robust US support for the land of the Middle East.
And Trump himself seems to be little influenced by the inner departments about his strikes on the Houthis.
“The Houthi bars were added enormous damage,” he wrote in a social media post on Wednesday. “You will be completely destroyed!”
